Selection of Proteolytic Lactic Acid Bacteria with Probiotic Properties for Fish Protein Hydrolyzate Production

Authors

  • Deford Cristy Birahy Biotechnology Study Program, Graduate School, IPB University, IPB Campus Darmaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
  • Titi Candra Sunarti Department of Agricultural Industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, IPB University, IPB Campus Darmaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
  • Anja Meryandini Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, IPB Campus Darmaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia; Biotechnology Research Center, IPB University, IPB Campus Darmaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.30.1.31

Abstract

This study aimed to select a proteolytic LAB with probiotic properties that can be applied to manufacture protein hydrolysate from fish heads. Tests on 20 isolates of LAB showed that nine isolates were proteolytic and non-pathogenic. A total of 5 isolates could grow well at 0.5% bile salt stress, and 3 of them could grow at pH 3. These three isolates had antagonistic ability against Salmonella bacteria, and one isolate was sensitive to the antibiotic tested. Molecular identification of the selected LAB isolates showed a 100% sequence similarity with Pediococcus pentosaceus with accession number MT515895.1. The LAB isolate has high proteolytic activity since it can increase the soluble fraction of fish meal powder from 32.10% to 88.38% in 48 hr. Production of protein hydrolysate using tuna waste was carried out for 30 days. Tuna waste protein hydrolysate had a medium antioxidant activity of 25.57 ± 0.93%. The hydrolyzed protein comprised 17 amino acids, including nine non-essential and eight essential amino acids, and is dominated by glutamic acid. Selected LAB isolate is potentially used in protein hydrolysate production, especially for flavor enhancers.

Keywords: antagonistic, amino acid, Pediococcus pentosaceus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adawiyah SR, Hafsan, Nur F, Mustami MH. 2015. Ketahanan bakteri asam laktat asal dangke terhadap garam empedu sebagai kandidat probiotik. Seminar Nasional Mikrobiologi Kesehatan dan Lingkungan; 2015 Jan 29; Makassar, Indonesia. Makassar (ID): p 164–173; [2022 Des 10].

Aditia RP, Desniar, Trilaksani W. 2018. Aktivitas antioksidan dan antibakteri hidrolisat protein hasil fermentasi telur ikan cakalang. Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia. 21(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v21i1.21256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v21i1.21256

Alemu F. 2015. Isolation and screening of protease enzyme producing bacteria from cheese at Dilla University, Ethiopia. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. 4(2): 234–239. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150402.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150402.25

An Y, Cai X, Cong L, Hu Y, Liu R, Xiong S, Hu X. 2022. Quality improvement of zhayu, a fermented fish product in China: Effects of inoculated fermentation with three kinds of lactic acid bacteria. Foods. 11(18): 2756. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182756

Baehaki A, Lestari DW, Romadhoni RA. 2015. Hidrolisis protein ikan patin menggunakan enzim papain dan aktivitas antioksidan hidrolisatnya. Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia. 18(3): 230–239. https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v18i3.11208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v18i3.11208

Baliyan S, Mukherjee R, Priyadarshini A, Vibhut A, Gupta A, Pandey RP, and Chang CM. 2022. Determination of antioxidants by DPPH radical scavenging activity and quantitative phytochemical analysis of Ficus religiosa. Molecules. 27(4): 1326. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041326

Bauer AW, Kirby MW, Sherris JC, Turck M. 1966. Antibiotic suseptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. The American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 45(4): 493–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493

Boland M. 2016. Human digestion–a processing perspective. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 96: 2275–2283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7601

Cheung R, Ng T, Wong J. 2015. Marine peptides: Bioactivities and applications. Mar Drugs. 13(7): 4006–4043. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13074006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/md13074006

Ejuama CK, Onusiriuka BC, Bakare V, Ndibe TO, Yakubu M, Ademu EG. 2021. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae induced fermentation on the antioksidant proper of Roselle calyx aqueous extract. European Journal of Biology and Biotechnology. 2(3): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbio.2021.2.3.201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbio.2021.2.3.201

Garcia EF, Luciano WA, Xavier DE, DaCosta WC, Oliviera KD, Franco OL, Junior MAD, Lucena BTL, Picao RC, Magnani M, Saarela M, DeSouza EL. 2016. Identification of lactic acid bacteria in fruit pulp processing byproducts and potential probiotic properties of selected Lactobacillus strains. Front Microbiol. 7: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01371

Gogineni V, Hamann MT. 2018. Marine natural product peptides with therapeutic potential: Chemistry, biosynthesis, and pharmacology. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA). 1862(1) :81–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.08.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.08.014

Hamida F, Wiryawan KG, Meryandini A. 2015. Selection of lactic acid bacteria as probiotic candidate for chicken. Media Peternakan. 38: 138–144. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2015.38.2.138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2015.38.2.138

Helmy EA, Soliman SA, Abdel-Ghany TM, Ganash M. 2019. Evaluation of potentially probiotic attributes of certain dairy yeast isolated from buffalo sweetened Karish cheese. Heliyon. 5(5): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01649

Jarriyawattanachaikula W, Chaveerachb P, Chokesajjawatee N. 2016. Antimicrobial Activity of Thai-herbal plants against food-borne pathogens E. coli, S. aureus. and C. jejuni. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 11: 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.12.004

Jemil I., Jridi M, Nasri R, Ktari N, Salem RBS, Mehiri M, Hajji M, Nasri M. 2014. Functional, antioxidant and antibacterial properties of protein hydrolysates prepared from fish meat fermented by Bacillus subtilis A26. Process Biochemistry. 49(6): 963–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2014.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2014.03.004

Jonesti WP, Prihatna C, Natadiputri GH, Suwanto A, Meryandini A. 2023. Tempeh flour as an excellent source of paraprobiotics. Biodiversitas. 24(3): 1817–1823. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240357

[KEMENKES RI] Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2011. Pedoman Umum Penggunaan Antibiotik. Jakarta (ID): Indonesia.

Khoiriyah H, Ardiningsih P. 2014. Penentuan waktu inkubasi optimum terhadap aktivitas bakteriosin Lactobacillus sp. RED4. JKK. 3(1): 52–56.

Khusnan, Prihtiyantoro W, Slipranata M. 2012. Identifikasi dan karakterisasi fenotipe Staphylococcus aureus asal kasus Bumblefoot dan Arthritis pada broiler. Jurnal Kedokteran Hewan. 6(2): 102–104. https://doi.org/10.21157/j.ked.hewan.v6i2.332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21157/j.ked.hewan.v6i2.332

Kristinsson HG, Rasco BA. 2000. Fish protein hydrolysates: production, biochemical, and functional properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 40(1): 43–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690091189266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690091189266

[KKP] Kementrian Kelautan dan Perikanan. 2020. Indonesian Fisheries Statistics Index 2006. Jakarta (ID): Indonesia.

Li C, Zhao Yue, Wang Y, Li L, Yang X, Chen S, Zhao Yongqiang, Zhou W. 2021. Microbial community changes induced by Pediococcus pentosaceus improve the physicochemical properties and safety in fermented tilapia sausage. Food Research International. 147: 110476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110476

Lindgren S and Pleje M. 1983. Silage fermentation of fish or fish waste products with lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Food Science and Agriculture. 10(34): 1057–1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740341005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740341005

Melliawati R, Djohan AC, Yopi. 2015. Seleksi bakteri asam laktat sebagai penghasil enzim protease. Pros Sem Nas Masy Biodiv Indones. 1(2): 184–188. https://doi.org/10.13057/psnmbi/m010203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/psnmbi/m010203

Mukherjee KL. 1988. Medical Laboratory Technology (A Procedure Manual for Routine Diagnostic Test). New Delh (IN)i: Rajkamal Electric Press.

Nespolo CR, Brandelli A. 2010. Production of bacteriocin-like substances by lactic acid bacteria isolated from regional ovine cheese. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 41(4): 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-838220100004000020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822010000400020

Nikita C, Hemangi D. 2012. Isolation, identification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from dairy sludge samples. Journal of Environmental Research And Development. 7: 1–11.

Nurhayati T, Salamah E, Cholifah, Nugraha R. 2014. Optimasi proses pembuatan hidrolisat jeroan ikan kakap putih. Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia. 17(1): 42–52. https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v17i1.8136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v17i1.8136

Ovissipour M, Kenari AA, Motamedzadegan A, Rasco B, Nazari RM. 2011. Optimization of protein recovery during hydrolysis of yellow fin tuna (Thunnus albacares) visceral proteins. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 20: 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2010.548910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2010.548910

Ozyurt GB, Özogul Y, Kuley E, Özkutuk AS, Durmuş M, Ucar Y, Ozogul F. 2019. The effects of fermentation process with acid and lactic acid bacteria strains on the biogenic amine formation of wet and spray-dried fish silages of discards. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 28(157): 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2019.1578314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2019.1578314

Panjaitan R, Nuraida L, Hariyadi RD. 2018. Seleksi isolat bakteri asam laktat asal tempe dan tape sebagai kandidat probiotik. Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pangan. 29(2): 175–184. https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2018.29.2.175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2018.29.2.175

Papuangan N, Nurhasanah. 2014. Potensi senyawa antibakteri isolat bakteri asam laktat yang diisolasi dari bakasang Ternate. Seminar Nasional Riset Inovatif II; 2014 Nov 21–22; Bali, Indonesia. Bali (ID): p. 1007–1012.

Ramesh C, Ray DM. 2015. Food Biology Series. Florida (FL): CRC Press.

Ramırez JCR, Ibarra JI, Romero FA, Ulloa PR, Ulloa JA, Matsumoto KS, Cordoba BV, Manzano MAM. 2013. Preparation of biological fish silage and its effect on the performance and meat quality characteristics of quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 56(6): 1002–1010. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132013000600016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132013000600016

Riani CR, Nuraida L, Meryandini A. 2020. Isolasi bakteri asam laktat asal jus nanas sebagai kandidat probiotik. Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pangan. 31(2): 103–112. https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2020.31.2.103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2020.31.2.103

Saad N, Delattre C, Urdaci MC, Schmitter JM, Bressollier P. 2013. An overview of the last advances in probiotic and prebiotic field. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie. 50(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.05.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.05.014

Sari RA, Nofiani R, Ardiningsih P. 2012. Karakterisasi bakteri asam laktat genus Leuconostoc dari pekasam ale-ale hasil formulasi skala laboratorium. Jurnal Kimia Khatulistiwa. 1(1): 14–20.

Schwarz S, Kehrenberg C, Doublet B, Cloeckaert A. 2014. Molecular basis of bacterial resistance to chloramphenicol and florfenicol. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 28(5): 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.04.001

Siddegowda GS, Bhaskar N, Gopal S. 2017. Fermentative properties of proteolytic Pediococcus strains isolated from salt fermented fish hydrolysate prepared using freshwater fish rohu (Labeo rohita . Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 26(3): 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2016.1185754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2016.1185754

Tallapragada P, Rayavarapu B, Rao PP, Ranganath NN, Veerabhadrappa PP. 2018. Screening of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria and production of amylase and its partial purification. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 16(2): 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.03.005

Thamacharoensuk T, Taweechotipatr M, Kajikawa A, Okada S, Tanasupawat S. 2017. Induction of cellular immunity interleukin-12, antiproliferative effect, and related probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated in Thailand. Ann Microbiol. 67: 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-017-1280-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-017-1280-4

Torino MI, Limon RI, Martinez-villaleunga C, Makinen S, Pihlanto A, Vidal-valverde C, Frias Juana. 2012. Antioxidant and antihypertensive properties of liquid and solid-state fermented lentils. Food Chemistry. 136(2): 1030–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.015

Urdaneta V, Casadesús J. 2017. Interactions between bacteria and bile salts in the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary tracts. Frontiers in Medicine. 4(163): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00163

Utomo BSB, Suryaningrum TD, Harianto HR. 2014. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolisis of protein hydrolisate processing from waste of catfish fillet production. Squalen Bulletin of Marine and Fisheries Postharvest and Biotechnology. 9(3): 107–114. https://doi.org/10.15578/squalen.v9i3.79 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15578/squalen.v9i3.79

Wangkheirakpam MR, Mahanand SS, Majumdar RK, Sharma S, Hidangmayum DD, Netam S. 2019. Fish waste utilization with reference to fish protein hydrolysate-A review. Fishery Technology. 56(3): 169–178.

Wikandari PR, Suparmo S, Marsono Y, Rahayu E. 2011. Potensi bekasam bandeng (Chanos chanos) sebagai sumber Angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor. Biota. 16(1): 145–152. https://doi.org/10.24002/biota.v16i1.69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24002/biota.v16i1.69

Wu HC, Chen HM, Shiau CY. 2003. Free amino acids and peptides as related to antioxidant properties in protein hydrolysates of mackerel (Scomber austriasicus). Food Research. 36(9–10): 949–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0963-9969(03)00104-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(03)00104-2

Yan L, Yang C, Tang J. 2013. Disruption of the intestinal mucosal barrier in Candida albicans infections. Microbiological Research. 168(7): 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.02.008

Yati SJ, Sumpono, Candra IN. 2018. Potensi aktivitas antioksidan metabolit sekunder dari bakteri endofit pada daun Moringa oleifera L. ALOTROP, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Kimia. 2(1): 82–87. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v2i1.4744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v2i1.4744

Yin LJ, Pan CL, Jiang ST. 2002. New Technology for producing paste-like fish products using lactic acid bacteria fermentation. Food Science. 67(8): 3114–3118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb08867.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb08867.x

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Birahy, D.C. , Sunarti, T.C. and Meryandini, A. (2024) “ Selection of Proteolytic Lactic Acid Bacteria with Probiotic Properties for Fish Protein Hydrolyzate Production”, Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 30(1), pp. 31–39. doi:10.18343/jipi.30.1.31.

Most read articles by the same author(s)