STRATEGI PEMUNGUTAN PENERIMAAN PAJAK REKLAME KOTA BEKASI

  • Aulia Ichsan Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan, Kementerian Keuangan RI
  • Hermanto Siregar Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Endriatmo Soetarto Departemen Sains Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Masyarakat, Fakultas Ekologi Manusia, Institut Pertanian Bogor

Abstract

One of the efforts of Local Government in financing regional development is through local taxes. Bekasi City is a cross-trade City and its strategic location has great potential to be able to maximize local revenue through the local tax sector, e.g. advertisement tax. The purpose of this research was to determine the growth rate and the contribution of advertisement tax to local taxes, measure the effectiveness and efficiency of advertisement tax, and determine the strategy in the implementation of revenue advertisement tax collections. Analysis methods of this research includes calculation of growth and contribution ratio as well as effectiveness and efficiency ratio and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Results of this research show that the growth rate of advertisement tax in Bekasi City average 20.65% and its contribution to local taxes average of 3.52% with the average effectiveness rate 82.20% (“quite effective”) and the efficiency level 6.31% (“highly efficient”). It is suggested from the AHP results that the Local Government of Bekasi City should implement a strategy of improving the quality and quantity of human resources as well as a strategy of improving technical guidelines on advertisement tax collection.

Keywords : advertisement tax, growth and contribution, effectiveness and  efficiency, strategy, Bekasi City.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Erawati T. 2016. “Analisis Efektifitas dan Efisiensi Pajak Reklame, Pajak Parkir, Pajak Hiburan, Produk Domestik Regional Bruto (PDRB) dan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) di Kabupaten Bantul.” Jurnal Akutansi Vol. 4 No. 1.

Halim A. 2004. Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta (ID): UPP AMP YKPN.

Harianto D, Adi PH. 2007. “Hubungan Antara Dana Alokasi Umum, Belanja Modal, Pendapatan Asli Daerah dan Pendapatan per Kapita.” Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X Makasar.

Hoque, Zahirul, Adams. 2008. “Measuring Public Performance.” Goverment Departements In Australia.

Ma’arif MS , Tanjung H. 2003. Manajemen Operasi. Jakarta (ID): Grasindo.

Mahmudi. 2010. Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta (ID): Erlangga.

Mardiasmo. 2002. Implikasi APBN dan APBD dalam Konteks Otonomi Daerah dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta (ID): Penerbit Andi.

Norregaard J. 2013. “Taxing Immovable Property : Revenue Potential and Implementation Challenges.” IMF Working Paper.

Poulson BW, Jules GK. 2008. “State Income Taxes and Economic Growth.” Cato Journal Vol. 28 No. 1.

Ratdiananto A. 2016. “Analisis Laju Pertumbuhan dan Kontribusi Penerimaan Pajak Reklame Terhadap Pendapatan Pajak Daerah.” Jurnal Perpajakan Vol 8 No. 1.

Saaty TL. 1993. Pengambilan Keputusan bagi Para Pemimpin. Jakarta (ID): PT. Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.

Sekaran U. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Bisnis. Edisi 4. Jakarta (ID): Salemba Empat.

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi. Bandung (ID): Alfabeta Bandung.

Wibowo P. 2008. “Mencermati Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Daerah.” Jurnal Keuangan Publik.

Published
2018-08-11
How to Cite
IchsanA., SiregarH., & SoetartoE. (2018). STRATEGI PEMUNGUTAN PENERIMAAN PAJAK REKLAME KOTA BEKASI. Jurnal Manajemen Pembangunan Daerah, 10(-). https://doi.org/10.29244/jurnal_mpd.v10i-.22697